List Epithetical Books The Egyptologist
| Title | : | The Egyptologist |
| Author | : | Arthur Phillips |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | First Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 396 pages |
| Published | : | May 24th 2005 by Random House Trade (first published 2004) |
| Categories | : | Historical. Historical Fiction. Mystery. Fiction. Northern Africa. Egypt |
Arthur Phillips
Paperback | Pages: 396 pages Rating: 3.27 | 3595 Users | 555 Reviews
Narrative Concering Books The Egyptologist
This darkly comic labyrinth of a story opens on the desert plains of Egypt in 1922, then winds its way from the slums of Australia to the ballrooms of Boston by way of Oxford, the battlefields of the First World War, and a royal court in turmoil.Just as Howard Carter unveils the tomb of Tutankhamun, making the most dazzling find in the history of archaeology, Oxford-educated Egyptologist Ralph Trilipush is digging himself into trouble, having staked his professional reputation and his fiancee's fortune on a scrap of hieroglyphic pornography. Meanwhile, a relentless Australian detective sets off on the case of his career, spanning the globe in search of a murderer. And another murderer. And possibly another murderer.
The confluence of these seemingly separate stories results in an explosive ending, at once inevitable and utterly unpredictable.
Mention Books During The Egyptologist
| Original Title: | The Egyptologist |
| ISBN: | 0812972597 (ISBN13: 9780812972597) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Rating Epithetical Books The Egyptologist
Ratings: 3.27 From 3595 Users | 555 ReviewsAssessment Epithetical Books The Egyptologist
Phillips, whose work in his debut novel, Prague, gained much acclaim manages to string together a dull, predictable, overly verbose, and frustrating "mystery" novel in The Egyptologist. Having figured out what happened by the time the first third of the novel was over, I was left to slog through this remaining avalanche of words only to be provided with a tremendously unimaginative and thoroughly unsatisfying explanation of what happened.And what a slog it was. Told exclusively through lettersShould you find yourself entombed in ancient Egypt, hope that your minions included a copy of Arthur Phillips's new novel among the gilded tools and ebony furniture. It'll make the time fly, and it's practically bright enough to read by its own light. "Yes, Ra, that Underworld sounds great, but I really want to get back to my book.""The Egyptologist" is nothing like Phillips's bestselling debut, "Prague" (2002), and yet it's full of all the dazzling talent he showed there. Presented as a
I heart unreliable narrators, and this book is full of 'em. Set in 1922, it tells the tale of Ralph Trilipush's quest to find the tomb of an apocryphal king/erotic poet named Atum-hadu (which translates to Atum-Is-Aroused). Amusingly, his expedition is concurrent with Howard Carter's discovery of the tomb of King Tut.The story is mostly in the form of Ralph's journal, which he is specifically writing to document his findings to be published as a book. He also adds in loving messages to his
Epic! This book is witty, hilarious and fascinating all at once. Takes a while to build up steam, but the reward is well worth it.I suspect some of the negative reviews are the result of readers who didn't stick with it, readers who didn't quite realize what was going on, or readers who thought Phillips was trying too hard to be clever.The book has multiple unreliable narrators who are constantly contradicting each other and sending letters across continents. In an interview, the author said one
This is a witty, heartbreaking, challenging novel about the nature of ambition and immortality and truth, and I loved every word of it. The novel is epistolary, presenting itself as a collection of two sets of documents: journal entries and letters from an archaeologist planning an expedition to Egypt in 1922, and letters from a detective writing in 1954 about an investigation that ties to this expedition. There are other letters sprinkled throughout to provide a few extra perspectives, but most
I've never read anything quite like this one...First, structure. The narrative is divided between two main characters with occasional additions from others. This alone shows literary skill; the book is told in several different and distinct voices.Second, the chronology has been gone at with an egg whisk. Back and forth we go until things finally start to line up. Sort of.'Sort of' because absolutely each and every narrator and character is unreliable. Some of what they say is true and some of
Recommended for Nabokov fans, amateur archeologists, opium addicts, people who address each other as Ducks.The old unreliable narrator gambit. Taking the book as a whole, its easy to dismiss this book as a failed attempt at pulling off the conceit. As I was reading, it held together until about the final quarter of the book. This is a funny, engaging book whose parts are better than the finished product and ultimately a engaging commentary on immortality and madness.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.