Define Out Of Books The BFI Companion to Horror: The British Film Institute
| Title | : | The BFI Companion to Horror: The British Film Institute |
| Author | : | British Film Institute |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 352 pages |
| Published | : | April 1st 1997 by Cassell (first published 1997) |
| Categories | : | Reference. Culture. Film. Horror |
British Film Institute
Paperback | Pages: 352 pages Rating: 4.18 | 17 Users | 1 review Reviews
Relation Conducive To Books The BFI Companion to Horror: The British Film Institute
Focusing primarily on cinema, but encompassing literature, television, radio, popular music, history and folklore The Companion provides a secret history of the horror genre from its pre-cinema beginnings in the 18th century gothic novel and the Victorian ghost story through a hundred years of film, spotlighting the great artists like Boris Karloff and Edgar Allan Poe as well as humble toilers like Edward D Wood and John Carradine.In addition to entries on actors, directors, writers and technicians and entries on horror-themed films and television series, the book provides insightful essays on classic horror characters like Frankenstein and Dracula, on recurrent situations like Decapitation and Body-Snatching, even on often-horrific portions of the body like Eyes and Brains.Identify Books Toward The BFI Companion to Horror: The British Film Institute
| Original Title: | The Bfi Companion to Horror (Cassell Film Studies) |
| ISBN: | 030433216X (ISBN13: 9780304332168) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Rating Out Of Books The BFI Companion to Horror: The British Film Institute
Ratings: 4.18 From 17 Users | 1 review ReviewsCritique Out Of Books The BFI Companion to Horror: The British Film Institute
A good resource overall, but some entries (especially: Angus Scrimm) are unnecessarily dismissive of the talents discussed therein, where they could perhaps be celebratory.A good resource overall, but some entries (especially: Angus Scrimm) are unnecessarily dismissive of the talents discussed therein, where they could perhaps be celebratory.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.